As I mentioned on the main page – I invite you to exchange ideas, but I reserve the right to moderate the content. It means the removal of profanity and content that may offend someone, which does not mean censorship understood as allowing “only legitimate” content. You can have your own opinions that you, as far as logically coherent and do not offend someone’s dignity (which, of course, does not exclude criticism). By the way, I impose content, but not entirely – you can suggest a topic (just contact, or you have the ability to comment on content). Next to – me, wandering for 50 years (so much has passed since this photo).

Veni mecum, si vis.

IMPRESSIONS – is sounds artistically, it may be better just an experience, but it fits better when we mean short impulses. Too long breaks – I blame myself. This is writing for myself aloud – so I invite you, although I do not have the ambition to create a propaganda tube of great scope. What’s more, I don’t even want to. So why? A kind of album whose frequency is the interpretation of time. And maybe that’s it, were it not for the fact of blaming – in this case time. After all, it is part of us in this regard – my fault. Unless the fault is the fact of writing.

The title of the blog – religion, is as general as directional. From mine, and I hope not only my observations, the hunger of this topic is permanently insatiate at all. However, there is no regular discussion, or rather, it is not to very much. Non-reflective acceptance or vicious attack prevails (I ignore academic discussions, these are still presentthere for luck). I decide to think loudly. It’s true that I do it not to many to often – lack of time. And offcourse not only religion, but also of any philosophical thinking you wish – we’ll see.

The more the offensive minded writer, the better. At least, it’s not about the so-called “only right views,” but the search for the truth. Man as homo religiosus must face this question, even if the answer is negative. Yes I am a theologian and is in some way influences my attitude towards the problem.

If you are an atheist, I hope you are not belligerent. I hate all kinds of fanaticisms – religious ones as well. Even those subtles, as in the Paul Dirac case, about him Wolfgang Pauli expressed once time: “There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.” An interesting parabola with shahada ا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا الله مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ اللهThere is no God but Allah, and Mohammed is His Prophet – pronounced three times, he makes us a follower. Indeed – it can not be said that God exists, but it is also absurd to say also that He does not exist. This is exactly faith.

Well – a system of values that is based only on the attachment to symbolism and safe identification with a group in which we feel comfortable, it’s a little bit not enough. If not even it’s a road to nowhere. Of course, I do not promote different views. Rather, I try to point out that the symbol remains only a symbol and is not a reality in itself. We are brought up in specific cultural contexts. If you ask both the atheist and the theist, do he believe – the answer

●

As I mentioned on the main page – I invite you to exchange ideas, but I reserve the right to moderate the content. It means the removal of profanity and content that may offend someone, which does not mean censorship understood as allowing “only legitimate” content. You can have your own opinions that you, as far as logically coherent and do not offend someone’s dignity (which, of course, does not exclude criticism). By the way, I impose content, but not entirely – you can suggest a topic (just contact, or you have the ability to comment on content). Next to – me, wandering for 50 years (so much has passed since this photo).

Veni mecum, si vis.

IPRESSIONS

IMPRESSIONS – is sounds artistically, it may be better just an experience, but it fits better when we mean short impulses. Too long breaks – I blame myself. This is writing for myself aloud – so I invite you, although I do not have the ambition to create a propaganda tube of great scope. What’s more, I don’t even want to. So why? A kind of album whose frequency is the interpretation of time. And maybe that’s it, were it not for the fact of blaming – in this case time. After all, it is part of us in this regard – my fault. Unless the fault is the fact of writing.

RELIGION

The title of the blog – religion, is as general as directional. From mine, and I hope not only my observations, the hunger of this topic is permanently insatiate at all. However, there is no regular discussion, or rather, it is not to very much. Non-reflective acceptance or vicious attack prevails (I ignore academic discussions, these are still presentthere for luck). I decide to think loudly. It’s true that I do it not to many to often – lack of time. And offcourse not only religion, but also of any philosophical thinking you wish – we’ll see.

The more the offensive minded writer, the better. At least, it’s not about the so-called “only right views,” but the search for the truth. Man as homo religiosus must face this question, even if the answer is negative. Yes I am a theologian and is in some way influences my attitude towards the problem.

If you are an atheist, I hope you are not belligerent. I hate all kinds of fanaticisms – religious ones as well. Even those subtles, as in the Paul Dirac case, about him Wolfgang Pauli expressed once time: “There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.” An interesting parabola with shahada ا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا الله مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ اللهThere is no God but Allah, and Mohammed is His Prophet – pronounced three times, he makes us a follower. Indeed – it can not be said that God exists, but it is also absurd to say also that He does not exist. This is exactly faith.

Well – a system of values that is based only on the attachment to symbolism and safe identification with a group in which we feel comfortable, it’s a little bit not enough. If not even it’s a road to nowhere. Of course, I do not promote different views. Rather, I try to point out that the symbol remains only a symbol and is not a reality in itself. We are brought up in specific cultural contexts. If you ask both the atheist and the theist, do he believe – the answer